Fine and Performing Arts Center Bowie State University Construction Cost

Download

Skip this Video

Loading SlideShow in five Seconds..

Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center PowerPoint Presentation

Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Centre

Download Presentation

Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

---

1. Bowie State Academy Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Counselor: Dr. Stephen Treado

2. Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Heart Project Team Owner: University of Maryland CM: Holder Construction Company Architect: EYP Architecture and Engineering Mechanical Contractor: W.E. Bowers Electric Contractor: Mona Electric Controls Contractor: Seimens Commissioning Say-so: EMC/Eaton MEP Engineer: EYP Architecture and Applied science • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Footing Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado

3. Project Overview • Site • Bowie, Maryland • Southeast corner of campus • Projection Data • 123,000 square anxiety • $79 million • Design-Bid-Build delivery method • Architecture • Big expanse of glass • Mixed use building • Multiple large performance spaces • Fine art gallery • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Rut Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion Courtesy of Google Maps

4. Existing Mechanical System • 3 Mixed Air Units with enthalpy wheels • 16 Air Handling Units • 64 VAV boxes (40 to 1,200 CFM) • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Arrangement • Lighting Breadth • Toll and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

5. Existing Mechanical Organization • Two 1712 MBH gas fired boilers • Four heating water pumps • 305 ton air cooled chiller • Iv chilled water pumps • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Rut Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Organization • Lighting Latitude • Price and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

6. Existing Mechanical System • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Determination

7. Proposed Redesign • Goals for the redesign • Improve the mechanical efficiency • Reduce utility bills • Redesign Components • Basis source heat pump • Underfloor air distribution • Energy efficient lighting system • Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical Arrangement • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Arrangement • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

8. Basis Source Oestrus Pump • Soil type • Cretaceous • Diffusivity = .nine ft2 /day • Electrical conductivity = 1.1 Btu/h*ft*°F • Calculations • Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical Organisation • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Latitude • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

9. Ground Source Heat Pump • Equipment • 510 bores at 544 ft • two gpm/ton • System menstruum rate: 410 gpm • five" headers and 1" U-tube piping • Total head loss: 54 ft of h2o • Two 10 HP 1750 RPM pumps • Energy Model • Heating: Saved 411,164 kBtu/twelvemonth • Cooling: Saved 153,327 kBtu/yr • Auxiliary: Used additional 237,532 kBtu/year • Cyberspace Savings: 326,959 kBtu/yr • Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical Organization • Proposed Redesign • Footing Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Price and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

10. Underfloor Air Distribution • Location of the systems • Big volume spaces • Encourage stratification • Duct layout • Less ductwork • Lower pressure drop • Less fan power • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical Organisation • Proposed Redesign • Footing Source Oestrus Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Organization • Lighting Breadth • Toll and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion

11. Underfloor Air Distribution • Free energy Usage • Minor reduction in cooling load • Significant increase in heating load • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Oestrus Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • System Drawbacks • Raised floor system • Larger fan • More materials • Longer construction time • Uses more free energy • This organisation was not farther investigated • Organization Sizing • Increased duct length ~20% • Increased fan power and size

12. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical Arrangement • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Latitude • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Energy Efficient Lighting • Redesign Goal • Reduce the yearly kWh in the offices and classrooms • Provide adequate light for required tasks • Methods • Energy efficient luminaires • T5HO lamps • Occupancy sensors

13. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Latitude • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Energy Efficient Lighting • Existing Lighting Pattern • Offices • Recessed direct luminaires • Two pes luminaires with two 40 Watt TT5 lamps • i.55 Watts/sq. ft. • Classrooms • Recessed directly luminaires • Four human foot luminaires with two 32 Watt T8 lamps • 1.47 Watts/sq. ft. • Proposed Lighting Design • Offices and classrooms • Suspended direct/indirect luminaires • Four pes luminaires with i 54 Watt T5HO lamps

14. Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical Arrangement • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Organization • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Determination • Energy Efficient Lighting • Illuminance Values • Office: thirty foot-candles • Music Classrooms: fifteen foot-candles • AGI Model • Less watts per luminaire • Half equally many luminaires • Fantabulous energy savings

15. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical Organization • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Estrus Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution Organisation • Lighting Latitude • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Energy Efficient Lighting • Occupancy Sensors • Offices: Passive infrared • Classrooms: Ultrasonic • Equivalent Full Load Hours • Offices: 2870 • Classrooms: 2522 • Hours Saved • Offices: 1091 • Classrooms: 1463

16. Classroom Energy Savings • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical Organization • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion Office Free energy Savings

17. Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Footing Source Rut Pump Cost and Savings • Full System Price: $2,938,000 • BG&E Incentive: $i,000,000 • Net Toll: $i,938,000 • Full Utility Savings: -$665.27

18. Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion Lighting Redesign Price and Savings

19. Unproblematic Payback • Occupancy Sensor Costs and Savings • Initial Cost of Sensors: $4,480 • BG&E 75% Incentive: $1,120 • Price of Installation: $x,080 • Net Full Toll: $11,200 • Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Occupancy Sensor Cost and Savings • Initial cost of sensors: $four,480 • BG&E 75% Incentive: $1,120 • Cost of Installation: $10,080 • Net Total Price: $11,200 • Uncomplicated Payback

20. Presentation Outline • Projection Overview • Existing Mechanical System • Proposed Redesign • Basis Source Estrus Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion • Recommendations • Footing Source Oestrus Pump • Reduced energy consumption • Expensive to install • Increased utility costs • Explore other options • Underfloor Air Distribution • Expensive to install • Increased energy consumption • Increased construction time • Explore other options • Lighting Redesign • Less expensive to install • Reduced energy consumption and costs • Implement this blueprint • Occupancy Sensors • Reduced energy consumption and costs • More expensive to install • 8.eight year payback • Implement this design

21. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Existing Mechanical Arrangement • Proposed Redesign • Ground Source Heat Pump • Underfloor Air Distribution System • Lighting Breadth • Cost and Savings • Recommendations • Conclusion Acknowledgements Architectural Technology Faculty and Staff Dr. Stephen Treado Adam Seigrist and Mike Luffred of EMC/Eaton Hayes Todd of Holder Structure My Friends and Family Questions?

grequodwilliams.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.slideserve.com/hali/bowie-state-university-fine-and-performing-arts-center